NOBEL Award's Matter
2009 NOBEL Award – Economics
Tags: Barack Obama, economic development, economics ideas, economics profession, efficient market hypothesis, government organization, Harvard University, Indiana University, interconnection rates, International Monetary Fund, internet conference calls, mathematical term, National Economic, neo-classical economists, NOBEL Award, political scientist, private sector, qualitative methodology, telecommunications industry
In 2009 NOBEL Prize Economics went to two Americans who
distinguished themselves by thinking outside the box and articulating their work through a qualitative methodology.
The economics profession did not expect the prizes to go to individuals who were not rigorous in a mathematical sense, as economics schools have been captured for a very long time by individuals who are obsessed in presenting economics ideas, thoughts and theories in elegant mathematical terms.
One of the prize winners is not even a practicing economist. Elinor Ostrom is a political scientist by training and as she is from Indiana University, is not of Ivy League pedigree. The other co-winner is Oliver Williamson from the University of California, Berkeley.
Well-known blogger and Harvard University professor Gregory Mankiw gave Williamson a one-in-50 chance of winning the prize. Mankiw’s favorite was Eugene Fama, who developed the efficient-market hypothesis (EMH) which, according to Lawrence




